Some might simply call it “law enforcement”
That’s a crying shame
That’s just lovely
How did you become a judge again?
Your sentence is complete. Now get out of our country.
You realize that harboring is a crime, right?
Can’t hurt to try, I suppose
Take off, hosers
Why? Was your parade harboring criminals?
“Fear is stronger than any wall.”
“we will now look at the number of publishers that are posting articles on Facebook about the same topic…”
“We’ll see what Congress moves forward with.”
Not exactly, but there are some cracks in the wall
“Could you do it?’ I think you could.”
You seem to be missing the point
Breaking the law
Oh, do tell us more
Federal law commands the State Department to stop issuing visas to countries who refuse to take back their criminals. What went wrong?
“I thought that we could work with him and the campaign to move him to the center on immigration.”
“We will break the cycle of amnesty and illegal immigration. There will be no amnesty.”
“I never took him seriously on this.”
“He has said if you want to be here legally, you have to apply to be here legally.”
“We’re going to see what happens once we strengthen up our border.”
“It’s not ‘amnesty.’ It’s ‘comprehensive immigration reform’!!!!”
“[I]f people are anticipating that there would be a deportation corps … that softening means that’s less likely.”
“I think this is a mistake. It sounds like it’s coming from consultants.”
“We want to come up with a really fair, but firm answer.”
“He’s thinking that through.”
What’s that again?
It’s a complete and total fabrication.
Don’t hold your breath
Third time’s a charm?
Si, se puede
Nothing to see here… move along
“…the reach of known operations during the US election of 2016 was statistically very small compared to overall engagement on political issues.”