What could possibly go wrong?
Low expectations met
“This deal represents the same failed approach of the past that brought us to the current imminent threat we face from North Korea.”
“Given current active security threats, it is not possible to assure that the event could be held successfully.”
“It could have been worse.”
A shotgun bullet.
This plan needs some work
Suspect dead, questions remain.
Raw Story: Suspect a “disgraced left-wing journalist.”
Seriously, not literally.
“You don’t need significant number[s] to commit atrocities.”
“…without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations.”
“With that being said, NATO is very important to me.”
“There was no other reason, and no need to look for an excuse – not Jewish settlements…”
“You just have to stay as calm as you can … I took a bullet.”
“underlines the importance of an increased control over our territory…”
“Berlin seems to be one of only times ISIS has taken credit when attacker still at large.”
“We must get used to the idea that he was possibly not the perpetrator…”
Excited troops await Obama’s report on terrorism
Actually, a lot late.
“It is not possible to ensure zero risk despite everything we are doing.”
What you missed in the last debate.
This must be more of that “public versus private” opinion we’ve been hearing about
You probably shouldn’t be writing to your ISIS friends anyway…
Wife cooperating with investigators?
Wife skipped the country just before the attacks.
None dare call it treason.
On the crawl?