“If there was a new order, or if there’s a new appeal, we will be looking at it…”
Let’s just kick this can up to the Supremes, shall we?
“…the Trump administration’s new order is legal and falls under the president’s power over foreign affairs and national security.”
“…it is no longer likely that plaintiffs can succeed on their claim that the predominate purpose of EO-2 is to discriminate against Muslims”
“I think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way.”
“The hearing in Hawaii came in response to a lawsuit filed by the state itself.”
Second time’s a charm?
They don’t make capitulations like they used to.
Poised to defend the deconstruction of the administrative state?
ACLU vows: We’ll block the new one too.
11-day warning period?
Shouldn’t have been doing that anyway
“The document you’re referencing was commentary from a single intelligence source…”
Round Two coming up.
“…green-card holders and dual citizens of the U.S. and any of those countries are exempt.”
“You don’t need significant number[s] to commit atrocities.”
“National security has to trump ego.”
“Lesson learned, on me, I should have slowed it down by a day, maybe two.”
“It’s about people being mowed down in Nice …”
Still up in the air
Emphasis on “tried.”
No fly zone
No ban on US … yet.
“Not consensus, but confusion.”
Nurse declared Ebola-free.
Why quarantines exist.
Texas hospital exec: We fell short.
“I think that would demonstrate a level of seriousness in response to this that is merited at this point.”
Time for a travel ban.
Seeking to avoid a conflict
Court: 2011 maps bad, but ignores 2013 maps.
Going after the wrong big fish